 # Basic Equations of Ideal One-Fluid Magnetohydrodynamics (Part III & IV)

FEATURED IMAGE CREDIT: U.R. Christensen from the Nature article: “Earth Science: A Sheet-Metal Dynamo”

The image shows the overall distortion of magnetic field lines inside the core and its’ effect on the magnetic field outside.

This post shall continue to derive the principal equations of ideal one-fluid magnetohydrodynamics. Here I shall derive the continuity equation and the vorticity equation. Furthermore, I shall show that the Boussinesq approximation results in a zero-valued divergence. I have consulted the following works while researching this topic:

Davidson, P.A., 2001. An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics. 3-4,6.

Murphy, N., 2016. Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics. Lecture presentation. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Consider a fluid element through which fluid passes. The mass of this element can be represented as the volume integral of the material density $\rho$: $\displaystyle m=\iiint \rho dV. (1)$

Take the first order time derivative of the mass, we arrive at $\displaystyle \dot{m}=\frac{d}{dt}\iiint\rho dV = \iiint \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}dV. (2).$

We now make a slight notation change; let the triple integral be represented as $\displaystyle \dot{m} = \int_{V}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}dV. (3)$

Now, the mass flux through a surface element $dV = \hat{n}dV$ is $\rho \textbf{v} \cdot dV$. Thus, the integral of the mass flux is $\displaystyle \int_{V}(\rho\cdot \textbf{v})dV = \dot{m}. (4)$

We may write this as $-\displaystyle \oint_{\partial V}(\rho\cdot \textbf{v})dV= \int_{V}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}dV. (5)$

Now, we invoke Gauss’s theorem (also known as the Divergence Theorem) of the form $\displaystyle \int_{V}(\nabla \cdot \rho \textbf{v})dV=-\oint_{\partial V}(\rho \cdot \textbf{v})dV, (6)$

we get $\displaystyle \int_{V}\bigg\{\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+(\nabla \cdot \rho \textbf{v})\bigg\}dV=0. (7)$

Since the integral cannot be zero, the integrand must be. Therefore, we get the continuity equation: $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+ (\nabla \cdot \rho \textbf{v})=0. (8)$

Recall the following equation from a previous post (specifically Eq. (6) of that post) $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \textbf{v}}{\partial t}+(\nabla\cdot \textbf{v})\textbf{v}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\nabla\bigg\{P+\frac{B^{2}}{2\mu_{0}}\bigg\}+\frac{(\nabla\cdot \textbf{B})\textbf{B}}{\mu_{0}\rho}, (8)$

Now we define the concept of vorticity. Conceptually, this refers to the rotation of the fluid within its velocity field. Mathematically, we define the vorticity $\Omega$ to be the curl of the fluid velocity: $\Omega \equiv \nabla \times \textbf{v}. (9)$

Now recall, the vector identity $\displaystyle \nabla \frac{\textbf{v}^{2}}{2}=(\nabla \cdot \textbf{v})\textbf{v}+\textbf{v}\times \Omega, (10.1)$

which upon rearrangement is $(\nabla \cdot \textbf{v})\textbf{v}=\nabla \frac{\textbf{v}^{2}}{2}-\textbf{v}\times\Omega. (10.2)$

Using Eq.(10.2) with Eq.(8) we get $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \textbf{v}}{\partial t}=\textbf{v} \times \Omega -\nabla \bigg\{\frac{P}{\rho}-\frac{\textbf{v}^{2}}{2} \bigg\}+\nu \nabla^{2} \textbf{v}. (11)$

Recall our definition of vorticity. Upon taking the curl of Eq.(11) we arrive at a variation of the induction equation (see post) $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \Omega}{\partial t}=\nabla \times (\textbf{v} \times \Omega)+\nu \nabla^{2}\Omega. (12.1)$

Next, we invoke another vector identity $\displaystyle \nabla \times (\textbf{v} \times \Omega) = (\Omega \cdot \nabla)\textbf{v}-(\textbf{v} \cdot \nabla)\Omega (12.2)$

Using Eq. (12.2) in Eq. (12.1) yields the vorticity equation $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \Omega}{\partial t}+(\nabla \cdot \textbf{v})\Omega = (\nabla \cdot \Omega)\textbf{v}+\nu \nabla^{2}\Omega. (13)$

Returning to the continuity equation: $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+(\nabla \cdot \rho \textbf{v})=0.$

I will now show that the flow does not diverge. In other words, there are no sources in the fluid velocity field. The Boussinesq approximation’s main assertion is that of isopycnal flow (i.e. flow of constant density). Therefore, let $\rho = \rho_{0}>0$. Substitution into the continuity equation yields the following $\displaystyle 0+ \rho_{0}(\nabla \cdot \textbf{v})=0. (14)$

The temporal derivative is a derivative of a non-zero constant which is itself zero. This just leaves $\rho_{0}(\nabla \cdot \textbf{v})=0$. Now, since $\rho_{0}\neq 0$, this then means that $\displaystyle (\nabla \cdot \textbf{v})=0. (15)$

Hence, the divergence of the fluid’s velocity field is zero.